bugmeno.myopenid.com (![[info]](http://l-stat.livejournal.com/img/openid-profile.gif){kind=small} bugmeno.myopenid.com) wrote in ![[info]](http://l-stat.livejournal.com/img/userinfo.gif){kind=small} theppitak, |
* POSIX file descriptor is not standard [ANSI] C library?
* the standard [ANSI] C library is just fopen()?
* fdopen(), fileno(), open() is not standard [ANSI] C library?
* notice that MSVC++ has _fdopen(), _fileno(), _open(), not fdopen(), fileno(), open().
> - The standard C++ iostream library now doesn't support
> using fstream with FILE* or file descriptor.
* It had ever can do that? (มันเคยทำได้ด้วยเหรอ?)
> /me never feels disappointed with C++ like this before.
* To "include" doesn't mean that you are writing C.
* It is just a C-style code, which is one important part of C++.
* To be able to write C-style code is one advantage of C++.
* Every advantage having in C, will also have in C++ too (advantage ทุกอันที่มีใน C ก็จะมีใน C++ ด้วย), since C-style is a subset of C++. So, C++ will never worse than C (ด้วยตรรกะนี้, C++ จะไม่มีทางด้อยกว่า C).
* the standard [ANSI] C library is just fopen()?
* fdopen(), fileno(), open() is not standard [ANSI] C library?
* notice that MSVC++ has _fdopen(), _fileno(), _open(), not fdopen(), fileno(), open().
> - The standard C++ iostream library now doesn't support
> using fstream with FILE* or file descriptor.
* It had ever can do that? (มันเคยทำได้ด้วยเหรอ?)
> /me never feels disappointed with C++ like this before.
* To "include
* It is just a C-style code, which is one important part of C++.
* To be able to write C-style code is one advantage of C++.
* Every advantage having in C, will also have in C++ too (advantage ทุกอันที่มีใน C ก็จะมีใน C++ ด้วย), since C-style is a subset of C++. So, C++ will never worse than C (ด้วยตรรกะนี้, C++ จะไม่มีทางด้อยกว่า C).
